Example register · 4 September 2026
Inspect a real fanout without turning it into invented SEO certainty.
The primary example reuses one reviewed OpenAI API observation already published by AI Fanout. SEO Fanout adds a deterministic research plan; it does not rerun the provider or present the commonly operated source as independent validation.
Current evidence state
1 documented owner-run observation · 1 synthetic fallback
The documented case preserves the original search-action scope: four exposed queries and thirteen source domains, with no invented query-to-source mapping, demand or ranking claim.
Documented case · OpenAI API · 27 August 2026
Ahrefs vs Semrush for small business
- InputOne owner-run comparison question using the published AI Fanout protocol.
- Observed queriesFour provider-exposed strings covering comparison, first-party pricing and small-business reviews.
- SEO outputOne comparison-guide direction and three concrete work packages instead of four query pages.
- Evidence limitSource domains belong to the search action, not an individual query. Search demand and page ownership remain unknown.
Synthetic fallback
Inspect the interface without provider output.
The owner-authored fallback remains available for testing the transformation when no provider observation should be used. It contains modelled ideas and zero claimed sources.
Open the synthetic fallback →What the documented case proves
A transparent transformation—not a content verdict.
- The published fixture records input, provider, model, locale, timestamp, method and exact exposed queries.
- SEO Fanout groups those queries into reproducible work packages without another AI request.
- Source relationships stay at their published search-action scope.
- The case does not prove consumer-product equivalence, demand, rankings, page ownership or citation probability.